Monday, November 17, 2025

"By now, the psychiatric profession generally recognizes high rates of sexual side effects in adults. And all six of the psychiatrists I talked with for this article noted the importance, when prescribing, of informing adolescent patients about the possibility. They also mentioned the necessity, depending on varying state laws about consent, of informing parents. But Dr. Awais Aftab, who works with adolescents and adults and is a clinical associate professor of psychiatry at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, thinks that most prescribers are not having that conversation. 'I know of very few psychiatrists who discuss it as a potential side effect,' he said, judging by patients who come to him after having seen other practitioners, by his educational work with practicing trainees and by conversations with colleagues. He added that genuine informed consent throughout the practice of medicine is all too rare. Doctors 'might ask you to look at a pamphlet,' he said. 'That’s the culture that has developed. It’s: Here’s the medication I’m recommending.'
Peggy J. Kleinplatz, a professor of medicine at the University of Ottawa, told me about a moment that shed light on how family physicians and other primary-care providers — who write the majority of S.S.R.I. prescriptions in the United States and Canada — might be thinking about informed consent with patients. In 2019, Kleinplatz gave a presentation to family physicians at a Canadian medical conference. She asked her audience of some 50 doctors how many of them were aware of the sexual side effects of S.S.R.I.s. 'Eighty percent raised their hands,' she estimated. She asked how many informed their patients about these effects when they prescribed. 'Just one hand went up.' Then she asked why they didn’t. 'They said it’s a matter of patient compliance.' To inform about potential sexual side effects, they worried, was to risk the patient not taking the drug that the doctor thought necessary."

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/magazine/antidepressants-ssris-teen-sexual-side-effects.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&fbclid=IwY2xjawOIL9pleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFheG13VFBGNWdTUXhPU0d6c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MghjYWxsc2l0ZQIzMAABHqxAkZE8Dt6mB_1MmORvtOnqibQvBeQBbg-rSf41yKZOePKbRGE-UlahHSD8_aem_gklphRdPRKVlj1bpv1mS6Q

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Moynihan's Law

 Moynihan's Law is an observation attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, stating that the number of complaints about human rights violations in a country is inversely proportional to the actual degree of such violations in that country. In essence, the more complaints and outcry about human rights abuses you hear from a country, the better its real human rights situation tends to be, and vice versa—the countries with the worst records often make the fewest complaints or claims about violations, either due to repression or lack of freedom to speak out.

Origin and Application

  • The phrase is commonly cited in discussions of international relations, particularly when analyzing which nations protest or complain about human rights violations.

  • The idea has been referenced in the context of United Nations debates and is used to illustrate how repressive regimes often quiet dissent or suppress criticism, leading to less reported abuse, while freer societies have more outspoken discussion and critique about their problems.

Restatement

  • Moynihan's Law is sometimes phrased as: "The degree of oppression of any people is an inverse function of the amount of cries of oppression one hears from them".

  • Another version says: "The more you hear complaints of human rights violations from a country, the better its human rights situation".

This maxim highlights the paradox that open, democratic nations may appear worse in media or in public debate because their problems are aired openly, while truly repressive countries appear better simply because criticism is silenced

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Plates Facing Down



https://medium.com/intuitionmachine/anatomy-of-viral-illusion-170b36fb60c0

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

Parental Investment Theory and Mating Behavior

Parental investment theory (Trivers 1972) proposes that the mating behavior of a species is shaped by the amount of parental investment by each sex.



According to Parental Investment Theory (Trivers, 1972), the relative proportion of parental investment—the time and energy devoted to the care of individual offspring—varies across the males and females of different species. In some species, males tend to provide more parental investment than females (e.g., the Mormon cricket; Gwynne, 1984). In other species, females possess the heavy-investing parental burdens (e.g., most mammals; Alcock, 1993; Clutton-Brock, 1991).One of Trivers’ keen insights was to note that sex differences in parental investment burdens are systematically linked to processes of sexual selection in ways that potentially relate to mating strategies. Namely, within a given species, the sex that invests less in offspring is intrasexually more competitive, especially over gaining sexual access to members of the opposite sex. That is, the lesser-investing sex (e.g., male elephant seals; Le Boeuf, 1974) is reliably more aggressive with their own sex, tends to die earlier, tends to mature later, and generally competes for mates with more vigor than the heavier-investing sex (see also Alexander & Noonan, 1979). Furthermore, the lesser-investing sex of a species is intersexually more indiscriminate in mate choice than the heavier-investing parent. The lesser-investing sex is willing to mate more quickly, at low cost, and with more partners than is the heavier-investing sex (Andersson, 1994; Bateson, 1983; Clutton-Brock & Parker, 1992; Maynard Smith, 1977).



This does not mean woman are not promiscuous.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/sexual-personalities/201501/women-want-short-term-mates-too

----------------------------------


https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/sexual-selection-13255240

http://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/capsules/outil_bleu11.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_investment

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/zmbbbx/women-are-evolutionarily-programmed-to-cheat-researcher-says

https://www.slideshare.net/gracebaptie/parental-investment

http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/denisiuk.html

https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/promiscuity-differs-by-gender#1