Rants, Raves, Reviews & Reflections
Monday, November 17, 2025
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Moynihan's Law
Moynihan's Law is an observation attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, stating that the number of complaints about human rights violations in a country is inversely proportional to the actual degree of such violations in that country. In essence, the more complaints and outcry about human rights abuses you hear from a country, the better its real human rights situation tends to be, and vice versa—the countries with the worst records often make the fewest complaints or claims about violations, either due to repression or lack of freedom to speak out.
Origin and Application
The phrase is commonly cited in discussions of international relations, particularly when analyzing which nations protest or complain about human rights violations.
The idea has been referenced in the context of United Nations debates and is used to illustrate how repressive regimes often quiet dissent or suppress criticism, leading to less reported abuse, while freer societies have more outspoken discussion and critique about their problems.
Restatement
Moynihan's Law is sometimes phrased as: "The degree of oppression of any people is an inverse function of the amount of cries of oppression one hears from them".
Another version says: "The more you hear complaints of human rights violations from a country, the better its human rights situation".
Thursday, October 23, 2025
Friday, January 31, 2025
Wednesday, January 22, 2025
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
Tuesday, October 15, 2024
Parental Investment Theory and Mating Behavior
According to Parental Investment Theory (Trivers, 1972), the relative proportion of parental investment—the time and energy devoted to the care of individual offspring—varies across the males and females of different species. In some species, males tend to provide more parental investment than females (e.g., the Mormon cricket; Gwynne, 1984). In other species, females possess the heavy-investing parental burdens (e.g., most mammals; Alcock, 1993; Clutton-Brock, 1991).One of Trivers’ keen insights was to note that sex differences in parental investment burdens are systematically linked to processes of sexual selection in ways that potentially relate to mating strategies. Namely, within a given species, the sex that invests less in offspring is intrasexually more competitive, especially over gaining sexual access to members of the opposite sex. That is, the lesser-investing sex (e.g., male elephant seals; Le Boeuf, 1974) is reliably more aggressive with their own sex, tends to die earlier, tends to mature later, and generally competes for mates with more vigor than the heavier-investing sex (see also Alexander & Noonan, 1979). Furthermore, the lesser-investing sex of a species is intersexually more indiscriminate in mate choice than the heavier-investing parent. The lesser-investing sex is willing to mate more quickly, at low cost, and with more partners than is the heavier-investing sex (Andersson, 1994; Bateson, 1983; Clutton-Brock & Parker, 1992; Maynard Smith, 1977).
This does not mean woman are not promiscuous.
UNIVERSAL SEX DIFFERENCES IN SEXUAL DESIRE
Wikiversity: Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Parental investment theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_investment
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/zmbbbx/women-are-evolutionarily-programmed-to-cheat-researcher-says
https://www.slideshare.net/gracebaptie/parental-investment
http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/denisiuk.html
https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/features/promiscuity-differs-by-gender#1

