Monday, September 9, 2013

Friday, September 6, 2013

Miley Cyrus



My oh my, Miley Cyrus created quite a controversy with her performance at the 2013 MTV Video Music Awards. Strangely, I can't seem to stop thinking about it myself though it isn't as much the performance that has got a hold of me as it is the commentaries written about it.

The response which I find the most irritating is that it is somehow wrong to criticize Miley's performance for its raunchiness. For instance, Clinton Yates writes in the Washington Post "But what exactly is so disturbing about Miley Cyrus? It seems that we still can’t handle what it’s like for a young woman to be able to perform, as she chooses, without layering in a heavy helping of insults as well...When the white, 20-year-old, former child star and daughter of a country singer goes on stage and does something that the so-called ruling classes deem unseemly, it starts a firestorm."

Soraya Chemalys of Salon writes "The shame-filled objections to women like these are simply a double standard about power and worthiness. The outrage and “disappointment,” cloaked primarily in concerns about, “sluttiness,” “selfishness,” “craziness” and “inappropriateness,” add up to one thing: female unworthiness...Women, we’d like everyone to keep thinking, are unworthy of too much agency, authority, power and self-expression. Otherwise, everyday people would be decrying every top-billed male performer for engaging in the exact same behavior that Cyrus did last night. It would help if we taught kids, in school, to be critical of stereotypes, to understand constructions of gender, race and ethnicity, and to appreciate the important difference between sexiness and sexualization. Miley Cyrus deserves critique for the racially objectifying elements of her performance, and even for the production of an artistically questionable, odd and distasteful set involving bears and bad dancing. But Cyrus is most likely be criticized instead for being “slutty”or ”crazy” — and those words matter and speak volumes."

And finally Anne Theriault from HuffPost writes "Now, let's be clear: there was definitely a lot of slut-shaming going on, and it was really fucking disgusting. But what was equally disgusting was white feminists' silence over Miley's minstrel show.

What Miley is doing is cultural appropriation. She, a wealthy white woman, is taking elements from black culture in order to achieve a specific image. Her status as a member of a traditionally oppressive race and class means that she is able to pick and choose what parts of black culture she wants to embrace without having to deal with the racism and racialization that black women live with every day. In short, she can imagine that she is being "ghetto" without having any concept of what living in a ghetto would really mean."

So you see, if you are among the many people who are critical of Miley because of the somewhat pornographic content of her performance, you are actually a sexist pig more concerned about keeping females from acquiring too much power and can't seem to recognize Miley's true crime which is that she is actually a racist.

To be fair, I do recognize that there are a number of people who have run to their favorite social media outlets and simply labeled Miley with some derogatory terms without expressing any sort of actual coherent criticism. But the type of commentaries I quoted above don't seem to be pinpointing their attack to this narrow group of people. Instead they paint a picture of Miley's critics which fits their world view all the while ignoring or distorting the actual complaints. I'm not sure if this is a purposeful straw man argument or if it is truly something they are blind to. I mean, the complaints against Miley are pretty simple to understand. They can probably all be lumped into the categories of either bad taste or parental concern. Why is it so difficult for far leftist to simply accept that people are legitimately criticizing her for the reasons they give and that they are completely sensible criticisms to make?

This is especially true in the area of parental concern. The Parents Television Council (PTC) issues a complaint against MTV for airing the show with a rating of TV14 (suitable for 14 and up) and who can blame them? Would you really want your 14 year old son or daughter exposed to this sort of raunchy performance? Of course there are those who believe that exposing kids to sexual material is really not that big a deal. And while there hasn't been as much research in this area as there should be, the studies that have been conducted would disagree. For instance, this 2012 study published in Psychological Science concluded that Children who watch films with a high sexual content tend to lose their virginity earlier and have more partners. Not only are they more promiscuous, they are also more likely to engage in risky sex such as not using condoms.





http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/the-tongue-the-twerking-the-teddy-outfit-should-someone-have-stopped-miley-cyrus-vma-performance-8785494.html

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Woman assumes her ultimate form



I almost died laughing when this rampaging, insane woman actually said  @ 0:25 "Don't make me assume my ultimate form!"  Later @ 0:58 she say "I will go super saiyan!"

Somebody has been watching too much Dragon Ball Z!

Meta Space Glasses


Now these are augmented-reality glasses to get excited about! Meta has taken a different direction than Google, and it is one which I think may be for the better. Google is attempting to create glasses that will become a part of our everyday lives but in doing so, they have had to sacrifice a great deal of functionality. Meta on the other hand seems to be putting functionality first, even if it means creating a device which is bulky and aesthetically unappealing.



Thursday, August 29, 2013

Apparat: You Don't Know Me

Another wonderful song which was part of the Pilobolus's piece Automation.






Monday, August 26, 2013

James W. Griffiths: Room 8



Room 8 / 1 of 5 Films / Bombay Sapphire Imagination Series from Bombay Sapphire on Vimeo.

My favorite of the five films selected as part of the Imagination Series 2012 contest. The Imagination Series is a film contest sponsored by the gin company Bombay Sapphire. Participants used a short script written by Geoffrey Fletcher (the movie Precious) from which to create their screenplay around. The five best pitched screenplays were then selected and provided funding to create their films. After watching the films I gather the script was something along the lines of this:

Person 1: "What's that?"
Person 2: "Nothing."
Person 2: "Stop."
Person 1: "Why?"
Person 2: "Don't open it."
Person 1: "Why not?"
Person 2: "Because you might regret it."
Person 1: "I'll take my chances."
Person 2: "Fine, go ahead and open it."

Here are the other four films:


The Mrs / 1 of 5 Films / Bombay Sapphire Imagination Series Film from Bombay Sapphire on Vimeo.

Water Song / 1 of 5 Films / Bombay Sapphire Imagination Series Film from Bombay Sapphire on Vimeo.

Crab / 1 of 5 Films / Bombay Sapphire Imagination Series from Bombay Sapphire on Vimeo.

Concrete / 1 of 5 Films / Bombay Sapphire Imagination Series from Bombay Sapphire on Vimeo.

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Single Photo Illusion: Bela Borsodi



What an incredible illusion created by photographer Bela Borsodi as an album cover for the band VLP. Though the picture appears to be four separate images combined, it is actually one single shot. Closer inspection reveals that the various items in the photo are carefully laid out in such a way as to create the four image illusion. Well, that and a little creative painting of the coffee table.

Here is the same room from a different angle.


Check out the video. It is interesting to see it coming together bit by bit.

Monday, August 19, 2013

Max Richter: On The Nature Of Daylight

Gorgeous song I first heard during Pilobolus's performance of Automation. I have since learned that it was also used in a couple of movies including Shutter Island.